Puremoan

Just another WordPress site

Month: April 2012

Vavoomcyclopedia: What can we do about the word Whore?

XXFactor has an article this morning about the word Slut. To a certain extent I think that the Slutwalk movement does help reclaim the word. However, I am not at all phased by the word slut, I just hate the fact that it is gender-specific. The word Slut is the symbol of the huge double standard that plagues men and women when it comes to sex notably, praise men who are promiscuous but shame women who think, talk or are concerned with sex. The word slut should be entirely gender neutral. I have never used the word in a gendered way myself and I cannot see how it can bring weight to an argument in a mainstream setting. Using vague words to insult or shame is not a very good way of communicating. It can only serve to placate when no intelligent retort comes to mind. Common vague words that call attention to what someone does and could be interpreted many ways are Crazy, Slut, Creep and Whore. I our home, when my daughter uses the word crazy, I try to explain to her that without context, the word means nothing and in fact it’s an intelligent-conversation ender.

Some words however, are overused in completely inappropriate contexts. Take the word Whore for example which means a woman or man, who exchanges sex for money. At a time when most people know what the word prostitute or, more largely, sex worker means, the word whore can be avoided. Unlike the word Slut which has a positive context in women-centric groups and can even have an aspirational connotation in the world of BDSM, the word whore always has a negative connotation. My favorite use of the word is to refer to politicians who conveniently change their values to serve their wealthy donors, notably ‘Koch Whores’. Besides this oh-so-easy pun, there is much language that can be used to describe unconscionable, unethical, unscrupulous actions.

However, more and more, I hear young women use the term to refer to themselves. Recently, I heard a woman say: “I’m kind of a label whore.” What does that mean? Does it literally mean “I am an unscrupulous person who exchanges sexual favors to buy designer shoes, bag and clothing?” or is it a self-deprecating comment we are supposed to find charming? Why refer to yourself as a whore in casual fashion-related context AND in a Youtube video? I cannot think of a context where a woman can refer to herself as a whore outside of a sex work situation. And even then, prostitution, the act of providing attention, companionship and sex for a fee is hardly something that can be described as unethical. It’s just one of those activities that are unfortunately illegal even though there is no intelligent argument to leave it in the control of and to the benefit of criminals (like marijuana growing and selling).

Should the word whore be retired?

Girls, girls, girls!


Hannah and her friends live a life of ennui in dreary-colored New York.
After standing her ground and expecting to be hired out of her internship,
Hannah is fired and seeks diversion with Adam Sackler,
a friend with benefit who fancies himself a Dom (in the BDSM sense)
only Hannah hates the word ‘slave’.

What’s up with young women and ‘Girls’? Young women are up in arms about Lena Dunham’s new HBO TV Show ‘Girls’. To read the reviews and their comments it seems like young women are fuming over the fact that the show isn’t a specific representation of their own life. And why should it be? However, most of the reviews also read like they were written by young would-be writers who seem miffed that THEY didn’t get a HBO development deal from their own ‘memoirs-written-at-24’. Setting aside the envy factor, the rest of the reviews fault the show for not being diverse enough. Perhaps these people should visit ‘Tiny Furniture’ (also by Dunham) to be introduced to slow train wreck of her life.

Why does this TV show in particular need to be relevant to all twenty-something girls? Isn’t TV full of shows that do a greater disservice to Girldom? Like Gossip Girl, 90210, or any other overly produced show where women sport clothing inconsistent with their budget and hair/makeup inaccessible to normal busy working women. Everything about ‘Girls’ is under-styled and gray-ish and that’s nice for a change. Girls offers a view into a bubble inhabited by a small clique of people just going on about their neurotic/narcissistic life.

This isn’t the time to cut other women down for making their art. Stop acting as if there can only be ONE show about Girls written and produced by a girl. We do not live in that world anymore where all women need to aggressively cut each other down because there can only be one token pretty girl, one token manager woman, one token female writer.

I hope ‘Girls’ is so successful that it increases the number of opportunities available to young women writers.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén